Self-hosted
Fair 5.0 Easy 3.7 Secure 3.3
| Pillar | Criterion | Score | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Easy | Day-one UX Can non-technical staff use it without a project? | 4 | Editors can work after a short intro. Source |
| Easy | Operate Admin burden, updates, backups and language coverage. | 3 | Updates and backups are mandatory. Source |
| Easy | Integrate SSO, mail/CalDAV, APIs and common NGO connectors. | 4 | Forms, SSO and CRM plugins are plentiful — vet them. Source |
| Fair | Lock-in / exit Can you leave with your data in open formats, at known cost? | 5 | Full site files and SQL dump; many migrations exist. Source |
| Fair | Sovereignty EU legal entity, EU hosting, and exposure to extra-EU lawful access? | 5 | Any EU hoster. Source |
| Fair | Openness Open source or open standards? Are independent implementations possible? | 5 | GPL; huge independent ecosystem. Source |
| Secure | IT security Authentication, encryption, patch cadence and independent audit. | 3 | Core is fine; plugins are the risk. Source |
| Secure | User security 2FA, roles, phishing resistance and safe defaults. | 3 | Role model is OK; brute-force logins are common. Source |
| Secure | Personal data GDPR fit: DPA, residency, sub-processors and Schrems II posture. | 4 | EU hosting plus a short plugin list is a workable GDPR story. Source |