By
Deutsche Telekom
T Cloud
German Telekom public cloud (formerly Open Telekom Cloud) based on OpenStack.
Proprietary (OpenStack)
·
https://www.telekom.com/en/company/data-privacy-and-security/news/open-telekom-cloud
· EU legal entity
Cloud platformsVPS hosting
FES Scores
9
| Pillar |
Criterion |
Score |
Evidence |
| Easy |
Day-one UX
Can non-technical staff use it without a project?
|
2 |
Enterprise procurement expected.
Source
|
| Easy |
Operate
Admin burden, updates, backups and language coverage.
|
3 |
Platform ops still required.
Source
|
| Easy |
Integrate
SSO, mail/CalDAV, APIs and common NGO connectors.
|
3 |
IaaS catalogue for public sector.
Source
|
| Fair |
Lock-in / exit
Can you leave with your data in open formats, at known cost?
|
3 |
Rule baseline (rubric_v1): EU SaaS usually allows export, but remapping integrations still costs effort.
Source
|
| Fair |
Sovereignty
EU legal entity, EU hosting, and exposure to extra-EU lawful access?
|
5 |
Rule baseline (rubric_v1): EU legal entity + EU-hosted SaaS offering.
Source
|
| Fair |
Openness
Open source or open standards? Are independent implementations possible?
|
2 |
Rule baseline (rubric_v1): proprietary / non-OSI license — openness capped unless open standards dominate.
Source
|
| Secure |
IT security
Authentication, encryption, patch cadence and independent audit.
|
4 |
Telco-grade security positioning.
Source
|
| Secure |
User security
2FA, roles, phishing resistance and safe defaults.
|
3 |
Enterprise IAM.
Source
|
| Secure |
Personal data
GDPR fit: DPA, residency, sub-processors and Schrems II posture.
|
5 |
Strong German sovereignty narrative.
Source
|
Indicative scores from public information —
how we score.
FES Scores
9
| Pillar |
Criterion |
Score |
Evidence |
| Easy |
Day-one UX
Can non-technical staff use it without a project?
|
2 |
Typical onboarding for this product category.
Source
|
| Easy |
Operate
Admin burden, updates, backups and language coverage.
|
3 |
Vendor operates the hosted service.
Source
|
| Easy |
Integrate
SSO, mail/CalDAV, APIs and common NGO connectors.
|
3 |
Integrations vary; check current APIs and connectors.
Source
|
| Fair |
Lock-in / exit
Can you leave with your data in open formats, at known cost?
|
3 |
Rule baseline (rubric_v1): EU SaaS usually allows export, but remapping integrations still costs effort.
Source
|
| Fair |
Sovereignty
EU legal entity, EU hosting, and exposure to extra-EU lawful access?
|
5 |
Rule baseline (rubric_v1): EU legal entity + EU-hosted SaaS offering.
Source
|
| Fair |
Openness
Open source or open standards? Are independent implementations possible?
|
2 |
Rule baseline (rubric_v1): proprietary / non-OSI license — openness capped unless open standards dominate.
Source
|
| Secure |
IT security
Authentication, encryption, patch cadence and independent audit.
|
4 |
Security baseline depends on vendor posture and your configuration.
Source
|
| Secure |
User security
2FA, roles, phishing resistance and safe defaults.
|
3 |
Account roles and MFA availability vary by plan.
Source
|
| Secure |
Personal data
GDPR fit: DPA, residency, sub-processors and Schrems II posture.
|
5 |
European vendor GDPR posture; still confirm DPA and subprocessors.
Source
|
Indicative scores from public information —
how we score.
Log in
to rank replacements for tools on your Current stack.
Cloud platforms
8 alternatives
VPS hosting
8 alternatives
Sign in to see which of your organisation’s data flows use this tool.
Sign in