By
OpenTalk GmbH / Heinlein
OpenTalk
German open-source video meetings from the Heinlein group (mailbox.org). Breakout rooms and moderation tools.
EUPL-1.2
·
https://opentalk.eu
· EU legal entity
Video meetings
FES Scores
9
| Pillar |
Criterion |
Score |
Evidence |
| Easy |
Day-one UX
Can non-technical staff use it without a project?
|
4 |
Browser-based meetings for non-technical users.
Source
|
| Easy |
Operate
Admin burden, updates, backups and language coverage.
|
4 |
Cloud removes most ops; on-prem exists too.
Source
|
| Easy |
Integrate
SSO, mail/CalDAV, APIs and common NGO connectors.
|
3 |
Fits German public-sector stacks; SSO on enterprise.
Source
|
| Fair |
Lock-in / exit
Can you leave with your data in open formats, at known cost?
|
3 |
Rule baseline (rubric_v1): EU SaaS usually allows export, but remapping integrations still costs effort.
Source
|
| Fair |
Sovereignty
EU legal entity, EU hosting, and exposure to extra-EU lawful access?
|
5 |
Rule baseline (rubric_v1): EU legal entity + EU-hosted SaaS offering.
Source
|
| Fair |
Openness
Open source or open standards? Are independent implementations possible?
|
5 |
Rule baseline (rubric_v1): license classified as open-source family.
Source
|
| Secure |
IT security
Authentication, encryption, patch cadence and independent audit.
|
4 |
Security-conscious German vendor.
Source
|
| Secure |
User security
2FA, roles, phishing resistance and safe defaults.
|
4 |
Moderation and waiting rooms.
Source
|
| Secure |
Personal data
GDPR fit: DPA, residency, sub-processors and Schrems II posture.
|
5 |
German GDPR and EUPL transparency.
Source
|
Indicative scores from public information —
how we score.
FES Scores
9
| Pillar |
Criterion |
Score |
Evidence |
| Easy |
Day-one UX
Can non-technical staff use it without a project?
|
3 |
Needs a short pilot for hosts and AV setups.
Source
|
| Easy |
Operate
Admin burden, updates, backups and language coverage.
|
2 |
Self-host ops and scaling.
Source
|
| Easy |
Integrate
SSO, mail/CalDAV, APIs and common NGO connectors.
|
3 |
LDAP/OIDC on enterprise builds.
Source
|
| Fair |
Lock-in / exit
Can you leave with your data in open formats, at known cost?
|
5 |
Rule baseline (rubric_v1): self-host + open-source path supports exit with your data.
Source
|
| Fair |
Sovereignty
EU legal entity, EU hosting, and exposure to extra-EU lawful access?
|
5 |
Rule baseline (rubric_v1): EU vendor software; you choose EU infrastructure when self-hosting.
Source
|
| Fair |
Openness
Open source or open standards? Are independent implementations possible?
|
5 |
Rule baseline (rubric_v1): license classified as open-source family.
Source
|
| Secure |
IT security
Authentication, encryption, patch cadence and independent audit.
|
4 |
Depends on your hardening.
Source
|
| Secure |
User security
2FA, roles, phishing resistance and safe defaults.
|
3 |
Room roles are strong when configured.
Source
|
| Secure |
Personal data
GDPR fit: DPA, residency, sub-processors and Schrems II posture.
|
5 |
Data never leaves your network by default.
Source
|
Indicative scores from public information —
how we score.
Log in
to rank replacements for tools on your Current stack.
Video meetings
8 alternatives
Sign in to see which of your organisation’s data flows use this tool.
Sign in